| LHA Issues log - last update 12
January 2008 |
|
| Title |
Issue |
Open/cleared |
Comments |
| "Long-stop" date April 2009 |
New regulations come into force for all claimants |
Cleared |
LHA regs will apply to all claimants from April 09.
This does not mean that all claimants will move on to LHA from that
date (the new regs contain all the current protections). Unclear why
DWP lawyers felt they could not apply to all claimants from
April. |
| Advantageous changes |
How do changes to the size criteria fit in with the
advantageous change time limit? |
Open |
Under the current regs, these are dealt with under
D&A Reg 7(2)(a) as a regular change of circs and so the time
limit applies. But in future they will be dealt with under Reg 7A,
which is not subject to the time limit. |
| Backdating |
Loss of entitlement. Any protection? |
Closed |
Backdating a claim can mean claimant entitled to less
benefit. DWP advise they are considering changing the backdating
rules to cater for this however, this has not been mentioned since
so appears to have been abandoned. |
| Backdating and BRMA |
Which month to use? |
Cleared |
Does the LA use the current rent levels or the levels
at the start of the backdate period? DWP advise: use the rent levels
at the start of the backdate period. |
| Big bang |
Why did DWP not roll out to all claims at once? |
Cleared |
DWP comment: "Following evaluation of the Pathfinder
sites the decision was made not go with a big bang approach in order
to give LA’s a feed in time for transferring their caseload, this
will alleviate a lot of problems that big bang sites had and also
avoid the need for any transitional protections schemes which would
add complexity to the scheme." |
| Caravans |
Could the 'rental' charge and site rent fall under
different schemes? |
Open |
LHA does not apply to periodical payments of kind
falling within regulation 12(1) (rent) which a person is liable to
make in relation to a houseboat, caravan or mobile home which he
occupies as his home The policy intention appears to be that all
such charges are exempt from LHA |
| Children in JT accommodation |
How are they treated - definition in reg 13D does not
mention them |
Open |
Seems to be assumed + intended that term "joint
tenant" includes anyone else who comes as a package with JT but Reg
doesn’t say that. DWP comment: "Children living with joint tenants
will count as part of the household that they belong to, they cannot
be shared as they will belong to a specific joint tenant." |
| COCs – multiple COCs in same week |
What is supersession date if rent or LHA also also
changes in same week? |
Open |
Two superseding decisions will be required in
HBINFO’s view, as the rule that aligns multiple changes on the same
date only applies to changes of circumstance under HB Reg 79
superseded in accordance with Reg 7(2)(a) & 8(2); LHA changes
are superseded under the separate provisions of Reg 7A &
8(15), |
| Date of claim |
Which LHA rate is applicable where the claim is
backdated |
Open |
Current definition of "Date of claim" in HB Reg 2 is
assumed to apply; but perhaps this needs to be made clearer in
amended legislation |
| Date of claim & 60+ Cases |
60 plus cases are automatically started from earlier
date |
Open |
"Backdated" and date of claim rules differ from
working age |
| Foster children |
Do they count as occupiers and attract extra
bedroom |
Open |
Policy intention appears to be "no". But LHA regs do
not define children as excluding foster children and reg 2 in main
regs would include them |
| Gaps in claim |
Processing times where info is awaited to "fill" a
gap. Gaps decisions are crucial in deciding if claimant is a new LHA
case + who to pay |
Open |
Will impact on BVPIs and who to pay. A claimant may
be entitled to more money and payee may have to change so LA cannot
pay and then adjust later (as with similar transitional schemes in
the past). Particularly unique to LHA |
| Joint Tenant |
Unequal liabilities divvied up between them |
Cleared |
Definition of "cap rent" allows unequal apportionment
of joint rent |
| Joint Tenants |
Does the one-bedroom or "shared" rate apply.
According to a second wave site, a major issues for pathfinders |
Open |
In HBINFO’s view, JTs do satisfy the description set
out in Reg 13D(b)(ii) (exclusive use of one bedroom, kitchen and
bathroom). "Exclusive" is a term of art in housing law and it is
applied jointly to JTs. It means exclusive of the world outside the
front door, and in particular exclusive of the landlord. |
| Linking rules |
No linking provisions – new policy? Normal linking
rules; fire, flood, claimant in prison etc not included in draft
regulations |
Cleared |
DWP confirm no linking provisions. Note that this
will include old scheme tenancies where there is a short break
|
| Non-dependants |
Impact of non-dependants on joint-tenants |
Cleared |
DWP confirmed now abandoned policy of non-dep belongs
to first claimant |
| Non-dependants |
Where the non-dep clearly "belongs" to one
joint-tenant, do all joint-tenants gain an extra bedroom? |
Cleared |
DWP confirm the joint-tenant deduction will only
apply to one claimant and presumably only this person will get the
extra bedroom |
| Payee decisions |
How long before a decision must be made on payee |
Cleared |
CH/3629/2006 allows suspension under 11(2)(a)(ii) –
DWP advise although decision CH/3629/2006 allows for benefit to be
suspended it is not the policy intention that benefit is suspended
without good reason and should not be used as part of the normal
processing procedures. |
| Payee decisions |
Must HB be paid direct to all claimants from Apr
08? |
Cleared |
New payment rules only apply to new claims |
| Provision of information to Rent Service |
LA required to provide detailed info on service
charges etc. to TRS |
Cleared
HBINFO would maintain that claims
should not be held up |
The legislation only requires claimants to provide
information that impacts on their individual claims DWP advise The
legislation requires claimants to provide information that is
necessary for a LA to process their claim - which for LHA includes
the information that the local authority needs to pass to The Rent
Service |
| Recovery of excess where paid direct |
Can the full amount of the overpayment be recovered
from the landlord (i.e. the amount paid to the landlord and the
excess)? |
Cleared |
Under current regs it can if the landlord failed to disclose a
material fact. DWP have advised that they are considering changing the
legislation in this area. |
| Recovery target |
If payment is being made to the landlord, the excess
to the claimant and there is an overpayment, from which payment is
the standard deduction taken from? |
Open |
In HBINFO's view, it makes sense to recover from the
excess first. |
| Relevance of HB information sent to Rent Service |
Do TRS include HB rents when LHA rents are
calculated |
Cleared |
HBINFO members report different responses. RO (HBF)
Order contains assumption that no-one has claimed or will claim HB,
but not clear how that works when RO is dealing with data from real
tenancies where the claimant is on HB DWP advise: "excluded" |
| Rent changes within the year |
Rent increases (or decreases) where rent is more than
£15 below appropriate LHA level
Note that a change in
joint-tenants could be a "change in the category of dwelling" |
ClearedXX |
The Max Rent (LHA) cannot change; the cap rent itself
is decided in a preliminary procedure under Reg 13D(4). As the max
rent (LHA) is an arithmetical function of cap ret and LHA, could an
increase in actual rent before anniversary date still be picked up?
DWP advise: If the reckonable rent is increased / decreased this is
ignored for the purposes of LHA as the LHA shall apply until there
is a change to the category of dwelling, death, change of address or
the anniversary date. |
| Rent changes - impact on excess paid to
claimant |
Where the landlord is paid direct and there is an
excess paid to the claimant, does an increase in rent require a
recalculation of amounts paid to the parties even if there is no
change in overall entitlement? |
Open |
|
| Changes in number of Joint-Tenants which affect the
amount paid in rent but not the size criteria |
Will the calculation change if there is an impact on
the cap rent calculation |
Cleared
(The note in the box below suggests
the answer is that the LHA cannot change but the cap rent calc
can) |
DWP advise: The LA is not required to apply a new
LHA rate unless the size criteria changes, but there has been a
change of circumstances affecting the amount of the claimant's
benefit so the LA can (and should) supersede the original decision
under rag 7 of the D&A Regs. |
| Rent-free periods |
How dealt with under LHA? Do they count as "gaps in
claim" for start date of LHA? |
Open |
HBINFO have in mind that claimants could be better
off if entitlement does end and they become LHA cases |
| Rights of landlord |
When does Landlord have a right to know HB paid to
claimant
HBINFO view is that recent Commissioner decisions
have clarified the rights of landlords |
Open |
IT systems do not notify L/L if there is a short
break. DWP view on "person affected" challenged by CH/180/2006 DWP
advise "see regulation 90 for information about an affected person
needs to be notified. Regulations haven’t changed on this
area" |
| Statistical information |
Will DWP require info on why claimants are deemed
"vulnerable" for HB purposes? |
Cleared |
Pathfinders appear to have adopted very different
policies on who is "vulnerable" DWP confirm "no" |
| Studio flats |
Which accommodation category? |
Cleared |
13D(2) amended to allow one-bed rate to apply to
studios |
| Sub-tenants |
Do sub-tenants count as an "occupier" Potential for
double-counting. Numerous Commissioner decisions on "dwelling" could
be relevant to this |
Cleared |
DWP advise: "sub-tenants are included in the
definition of "occupier" and so would count in the size
critera". |
| Two homes payment |
Could this attract the £15 excess at both
properties? |
Open |
|
| What to call the £15 excess |
HBINFO is open to suggestions |
|
|